IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chrystopher Collin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-05-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 49 22 28 50 1.020 0.2614 0.2716 0.7692 0.7991
2018-19 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 54 22 32 54 1.000 0.2562 0.2529 0.7538 0.7442
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Bowling Green D1 CCHA JR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Bowling Green D1 CCHA SO 20 4 5 9 0.450
2020-21 Bowling Green D1 WCHA FR 21 1 3 4 0.191
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2020-21 · Bowling Green
-14.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15449
Forward overall
#730
Forward born in 1999
#122
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Luc Gerdes
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Devin Loe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Dahlseide
Wisconsin-Stout · 2018-19
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Asa Palker
Castleton · 2016-17
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ty Broad
Trinity · 2022-23
0.870 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.