IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kurri Woodford Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-09-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 33 2 4 6 0.182 0.0554 0.0586 0.1347 0.1425
2018-19 — SJHL 40 4 12 16 0.400 0.1218 0.1226 0.2964 0.2983
2019-20 Yorkton Terriers SJHL 53 4 14 18 0.340 0.1034 0.1034 0.2517 0.2517
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC JR 23 3 1 4 0.174
2022-23 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SO 12 2 4 6 0.500
2021-22 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 16 5 3 8 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2021-22 · Fredonia
+445.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17290
Defenseman overall
#2762
Defenseman born in 1999
#1725
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Pionk
Western New England · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jacob Berg
Trine · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Dave Lewandowski
Wentworth · 2003-04
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.