IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Warhoftig Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-06-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Estevan Bruins SJHL 7 0 2 2 0.286 0.0732 0.0766 0.2154 0.2254
2018-19 Blind River Beavers NOJHL 36 6 13 19 0.528 0.0881 0.0862 0.2197 0.2150
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Chatham D3 UCHC SR 24 13 12 25 1.042
2021-22 Chatham D3 UCHC JR 25 9 12 21 0.840
2020-21 Chatham D1 UCHC SO 6 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Chatham D3 UCHC SO 6 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Chatham D1 UCHC FR 21 0 5 5 0.238
2019-20 Chatham D3 UCHC FR 21 0 5 5 0.238
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2019-20 · Chatham
+237.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#41621
Forward overall
#2348
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Forbort
Wisconsin-Stout · 2014-15
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tao Ishizuka
Curry · 2018-19
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Salvatore Scalise
Concordia · 2016-17
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.