IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tao Ishizuka Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-06-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 — EHL 41 18 17 35 0.854 0.1249 0.1258 0.4186 0.4215
2019-20 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 45 29 29 58 1.289 0.1886 0.1886 0.6319 0.6319
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Curry D3 CNE SR 26 11 14 25 0.962
2022-23 Curry D3 CNE JR 18 2 2 4 0.222
2021-22 Curry D3 CNE SO 20 2 2 4 0.200
2020-21 Curry D1 — FR 4 0 1 1 0.250
2020-21 Curry D3 CNE FR 4 0 1 1 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2020-21 · Curry
+132.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
52%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9251
Forward overall
#412
Forward born in 1999
#92
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Paul Boutoussov
Salve Regina · 2015-16
0.724 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Workman
Finlandia · 2010-11
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bronson Zoltán Kovács
Hobart · 2009-10
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.