IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brady Cunningham Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-03-18 Country: USA
Bowling Green
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Lincoln Stars USHL 11 1 1 2 0.182 0.1072 0.1172 0.5460 0.5970
2025-26 Lincoln Stars USHL 49 4 7 11 0.225 0.1324 0.1384 0.6743 0.7047
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

72%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13313
Defenseman overall
#740
Defenseman born in 2008
#3552
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Trevor Hamilton
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Miami (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Steven Santini
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Josh Couturier
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Boston College (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Dorantes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Wolanin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Bowling Green Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Cameron Babiak
NAHL 2016-17
0.00
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
Anton Malmström
SHL-J20 2017-18
0.15
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
Michael Bevilacqua
USHL 2020-21
0.35
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
Brayden Crampton
WHL 2021-22
0.51
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green

D2/3 Comparables

Manny Gialedakis
SUNY Oswego · 2009-10
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Rick Varone
SUNY Oswego · 2000-01
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Skylur Jameson
Wentworth · 2004-05
1.778 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.