← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anton Malmström Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-03-18 Country: Sweden
Signed Professionally
Djurgårdens IF · SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Djurgårdens IF U20 SHL-J20 4 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Djurgårdens IF U20 SuperElit 23 0 2 2 0.087 0.0343 0.0356 0.1182 0.1227
2018-19 Djurgårdens IF U20 SuperElit 41 3 2 5 0.122 0.0481 0.0476 0.1657 0.1639
2019-20 Djurgårdens IF U20 SuperElit 41 4 5 9 0.220 0.0866 0.0866 0.2981 0.2981
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Bowling Green D1 CCHA JR 33 3 3 6 0.182
2021-22 Bowling Green D1 CCHA SO 36 3 1 4 0.111
2020-21 Bowling Green D1 WCHA FR 20 1 2 3 0.150
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2020-21 · Bowling Green
+271.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17390
Defenseman overall
#2693
Defenseman born in 2000
#2995
in SHL-J20

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.10 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Brown (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lake Forest · 2023-24
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Colby · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2016-17
0.150 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.