← New Search ↗ Social Card

Holden Doell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-12-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 3 0 3 3 1.000 0.2562 0.2562 0.7538 0.7538
2021-22 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 38 10 22 32 0.842 0.2157 0.2297 0.6348 0.6760
2022-23 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 49 33 67 100 2.041 0.5229 0.5307 1.5384 1.5613
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ferris State D1 CCHA JR 25 3 4 7 0.280
2024-25 Ferris State D1 CCHA JR 31 2 8 10 0.323
2023-24 Ferris State D1 CCHA SO 24 1 3 4 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2023-24 · Ferris State
-52.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
65%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6552
Forward overall
#226
Forward born in 2003
#3
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.82 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Boston University (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Thomas · 2014-15
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2021-22
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.