IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kevin Anderson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 2 2 0 2 1.000 0.2562 0.2562 0.7538 0.7538
2020-21 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 5 0 2 2 0.400 0.1025 0.1025 0.3015 0.3015
2021-22 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 58 30 49 79 1.362 0.3490 0.3680 1.0268 1.0826
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Princeton D1 ECAC SR 33 1 4 5 0.151
2024-25 Princeton D1 ECAC JR 28 5 4 9 0.321
2023-24 Princeton D1 ECAC SO 17 1 0 1 0.059
2022-23 Princeton D1 ECAC FR 9 0 3 3 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2022-23 · Princeton
+5.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

60%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8578
Forward overall
#357
Forward born in 2003
#14
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Jason Salvaggio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tony Calderone
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Michigan (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Greenberg
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Miami (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Aston-Reese
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew Headland
Canton · 2016-17
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Marra
SUNY Geneseo · 2012-13
1.161 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Ross
Lake Forest · 2018-19
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.