IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Cassidy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-10-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 54 26 25 51 0.944 0.2639 0.2572 0.6517 0.6351
2010-11 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 50 20 25 45 0.900 0.2515 0.2334 0.6211 0.5764
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SR 27 12 14 26 0.963
2013-14 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — JR 25 5 9 14 0.560
2012-13 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SO 21 5 10 15 0.714
2011-12 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — FR 22 3 3 6 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2011-12 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+31.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13951
Forward overall
#599
Forward born in 1990
#808
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Parker Wood
Endicott · 2014-15
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mario Bianchi
Concordia · 2014-15
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Carpinone
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2000-01
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.