← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sam LeDrew Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-03-19 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Kimball Union NE-Prep 30 18 20 38 1.267 0.3573 0.3573 0.5796 0.5796
2023-24 Kimball Union NE-Prep 35 38 38 76 2.171 0.6126 0.6126 0.9936 0.9936
2024-25 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 50 25 22 47 0.940 0.3501 0.3397 0.9820 0.9265
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC 32 10 8 18 0.562
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.38
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2025-26 · St. Lawrence
+46.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7371
Forward overall
#274
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2010-11
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2016-17
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2015-16
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.