IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kody Collins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-01-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Collingwood Blues OJHL 44 1 10 11 0.250 0.0613 0.0606 0.1719 0.1700
2007-08 Collingwood Blues OJHL 45 5 23 28 0.622 0.1525 0.1439 0.4279 0.4038
2008-09 Couchiching Terriers OJHL 44 3 25 28 0.636 0.1560 0.1392 0.4377 0.3906
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast JR 22 0 6 6 0.273
2011-12 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast SO 26 1 4 5 0.192
2009-10 New England D3 — FR 23 0 4 4 0.174
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2009-10 · New England
+30.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9491
Defenseman overall
#1151
Defenseman born in 1988
#1985
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Murphy
Rivier · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Eli Lynn
Becker · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Trey Gardner
Wisconsin-Stout · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.