← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jakob Kalin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-01-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Steele County Blades USPHL-Premier 15 8 10 18 1.200 0.1570 0.1570
2021-22 Renfrew Wolves CCHL 40 13 13 26 0.650 0.1410 0.1349 0.5029 0.4812
2022-23 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 54 22 24 46 0.852 0.2183 0.2015 0.6422 0.5928
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Niagara ACHA_D1 AHA 25 12 10 22 0.880
2024-25 Niagara ACHA_D1 AHA 25 12 10 22 0.880
2023-24 Niagara ACHA_D1 AHA 25 12 10 22 0.880
2022-23 Niagara ACHA_D1 AHA 25 12 10 22 0.880
2021-22 Niagara ACHA_D1 AHA 25 12 10 22 0.880
2020-21 Niagara ACHA_D1 AHA 25 12 10 22 0.880

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18708
Forward overall
#995
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2023-24
1.056 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2015-16
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2024-25
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.