IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jaryd Sych Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-02-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 58 7 28 35 0.603 0.1546 0.1584 0.4548 0.4660
2022-23 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 46 13 24 37 0.804 0.2061 0.2009 0.6063 0.5909
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Mercyhurst D1 AHA SR 27 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Mercyhurst D1 AHA JR 30 2 0 2 0.067
2023-24 Mercyhurst D1 AHA SO 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5817
Defenseman overall
#1418
Defenseman born in 2003
#390
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Fleming
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cayden Kraus
Salve Regina · 2018-19
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joey Lajcaj
Trine · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Garrett Alberti
Saint Anselm · 2021-22
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.