← New Search ↗ Social Card

Walker Jerome Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-10-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 La Ronge Ice Wolves SJHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 La Ronge Ice Wolves SJHL 57 11 33 44 0.772 0.1978 0.1994 0.5812 0.5859
2022-23 La Ronge Ice Wolves SJHL 54 19 33 52 0.963 0.2467 0.2364 0.7251 0.6948
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minot State University ACHA_D1 — — 30 6 3 9 0.300
2024-25 Minot State University ACHA_D1 — — 30 6 3 9 0.300
2023-24 Minot State University ACHA_D1 — — 30 6 3 9 0.300
2022-23 Minot State University ACHA_D1 — — 30 6 3 9 0.300
2021-22 Minot State University ACHA_D1 — — 30 6 3 9 0.300
2020-21 Minot State University ACHA_D1 — — 30 6 3 9 0.300

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19505
Forward overall
#1059
Forward born in 2002
#229
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2002-03
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2011-12
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2006-07
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.