IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Emmett Wurst Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-01-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Edina USHS-MN 27 8 5 13 0.481 0.0593 0.0593 0.1170 0.1170
2021-22 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 45 14 11 25 0.556 0.1423 0.1381 0.4118 0.3996
2022-23 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 46 7 8 15 0.326 0.0835 0.0768 0.2417 0.2224
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC JR 21 1 3 4 0.191
2024-25 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SO 14 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC FR 10 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#40746
Forward overall
#2553
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Drew Allen
Augsburg · 2011-12
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Principalli
Adrian · 2009-10
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Hanson
St. Scholastica · 2022-23
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.