IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jay Meloff Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-03-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 — OJHL 34 2 5 7 0.206 0.0619 0.0652 0.1409 0.1484
2008-09 — OJHL 23 0 6 6 0.261 0.0784 0.0785 0.1786 0.1789
2009-10 — OJHL 29 0 9 9 0.310 0.0932 0.0885 0.2124 0.2016
2010-11 — OJHL 33 2 10 12 0.364 0.1092 0.0986 0.2489 0.2247
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 SUNY Brockport D3 — FR 3 0 2 2 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2011-12 · SUNY Brockport
+646.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17493
Defenseman overall
#1712
Defenseman born in 1990
#4049
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Keith Clarke
Hobart · 2009-10
0.188 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Keaton Leininger
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2016-17
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Nieusma
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.