← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maguire Ratzlaff Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 SJHL 31 3 5 8 0.258 0.0661 0.0698 0.1946 0.2055
2022-23 Nipawin Hawks SJHL 49 23 15 38 0.775 0.1987 0.1999 0.5846 0.5881
2023-24 Nipawin Hawks SJHL 53 16 15 31 0.585 0.1499 0.1437 0.4409 0.4226
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Liberty University ACHA_D1 17 4 5 9 0.529
2024-25 Liberty University ACHA_D1 17 4 5 9 0.529
2023-24 Liberty University ACHA_D1 17 4 5 9 0.529
2022-23 Liberty University ACHA_D1 17 4 5 9 0.529
2021-22 Liberty University ACHA_D1 17 4 5 9 0.529
2020-21 Liberty University ACHA_D1 17 4 5 9 0.529

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32612
Forward overall
#1962
Forward born in 2003
#682
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Suffolk · 2022-23
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2009-10
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.