IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carter Schram Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-09-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Thunder Hockey Club NCDC 42 4 2 6 0.143 0.0330 0.0333 — —
2022-23 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Premier 38 17 24 41 1.079 0.1217 0.1158 0.3670 0.3492
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Augsburg D3 MIAC SR 7 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Augsburg D3 MIAC — 14 2 2 4 0.286
2023-24 Suffolk D3 CNE — 23 4 5 9 0.391
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2023-24 · Suffolk
+451.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22140
Forward overall
#1218
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Paul Marcoux
St. Scholastica · 2008-09
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Scott
Suffolk · 2021-22
0.381 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tino Alunni
Lebanon Valley · 2017-18
0.423 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.