IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kris Faric Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-04-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Bowmanville Eagles OJHL 38 5 14 19 0.500 0.1226 0.1351 0.3442 0.3792
2007-08 — OJHL 47 4 9 13 0.277 0.0678 0.0716 0.1904 0.2011
2008-09 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 44 17 24 41 0.932 0.2284 0.2296 0.6414 0.6447
2009-10 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 46 25 26 51 1.109 0.2717 0.2588 0.7631 0.7269
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Salem State D3 MASCAC — 25 10 10 20 0.800
2013-14 Salem State D3 MASCAC — 28 5 8 13 0.464
2012-13 Salem State D3 MASCAC — 25 9 15 24 0.960
2011-12 Castleton D3 LittleEast — 2 0 1 1 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2011-12 · Castleton
+136.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20715
Forward overall
#800
Forward born in 1990
#837
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Devin Loe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Luc Gerdes
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Craig Kitto
Williams · 2009-10
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dalton Jay
Westfield State · 2010-11
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nate Scurfield
Lawrence · 2010-11
0.471 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.