IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matthew Sollows Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-03-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Vaughan Vipers OJHL 54 8 27 35 0.648 0.1588 0.1585 0.4436 0.4428
2010-11 Vaughan Vipers OJHL 49 7 22 29 0.592 0.1451 0.1381 0.4051 0.3856
2011-12 Vaughan Vipers OJHL 17 1 7 8 0.471 0.1153 0.1046 0.3221 0.2923
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#9226
Defenseman overall
#1178
Defenseman born in 1991
#1957
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colton Kennedy
Wisconsin-Superior · 2009-10
0.316 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Cameron Shorrock
Bryn Athyn · 2018-19
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan Homitz
SUNY Cortland · 2017-18
0.278 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.