IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Houle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-11-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Kemptville 73's CCHL 53 2 13 15 0.283 0.0904 0.0946 0.2191 0.2293
2022-23 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 28 3 8 11 0.393 0.1197 0.1212 0.2912 0.2949
2023-24 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 52 12 56 68 1.308 0.3983 0.3845 0.9691 0.9355
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Clarkson D1 ECAC — 6 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Lindenwood D1 CCHA — 32 4 12 16 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2024-25 · Lindenwood
+89.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4376
Defenseman overall
#1100
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Paul LaDue
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Barrett Kaib
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Newell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mark Ehl
New England College · 2005-06
1.071 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin Callanan
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2021-22
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dillon Henningson
Manhattanville · 2005-06
0.765 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.