IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

George Curry Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-12-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Soo Eagles NOJHL 44 14 39 53 1.204 0.2031 0.2049 0.5005 0.5049
2011-12 Soo Eagles NOJHL 41 9 23 32 0.780 0.1316 0.1258 0.3243 0.3100
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Canton D3 — SR 27 5 7 12 0.444
2014-15 Canton D3 — JR 25 8 6 14 0.560
2013-14 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SO 5 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 Canton D3 — FR 15 2 5 7 0.467
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2012-13 · Canton
+246.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25854
Forward overall
#1004
Forward born in 1991
#181
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Raymond Fleming
St. Olaf · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wyatt Wurst
St. Scholastica · 2023-24
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Murphy
Westfield State · 2009-10
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.