← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Prunty Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2009-03-04 Country: USA
Top 20 — 2027 NHL Draft Prospect
UMass Amherst
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 44 4 33 37 0.841 0.4960 0.5422 2.5233 2.7583
2026-27 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 8 0 2 2 0.250 0.1858 0.1858 0.9375 0.9375
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

78%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1140
Defenseman overall
#20
Defenseman born in 2009
#364
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Boston College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Boston College (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average D
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Miami (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2007-08
1.258 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2000-01
1.040 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2004-05
0.903 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.