← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brayden Willis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-09-16 Country: USA
Minnesota
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Chanhassen USHS-MN 17 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Chanhassen USHS-MN 28 16 13 29 1.036 0.1311 0.1311 0.2515 0.2515
2023-24 Chanhassen USHS-MN 28 5 15 20 0.714 0.0904 0.0904 0.1734 0.1734
2025-26 — NTDP-U18 61 24 29 53 0.869 0.6459 0.6724 3.2582 3.3920
2026-27 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 8 1 4 5 0.625 0.4646 0.4646 2.3436 2.3436
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

85%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7861
Forward overall
#28
Forward born in 2009

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.75 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Minnesota Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2020-21
0.21
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
USHL 2019-20
0.31
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
USHL 2014-15
0.20
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
USHL 2020-21
0.29
actual FR PPG at Minnesota

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2016-17
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.