IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Louis Jonerheim Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-07-07 Country: Sweden
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Signed Professionally
Malmö Redhawks · SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Malmö Redhawks U20 SHL-J20 12 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 Malmö Redhawks U20 SuperElit 10 0 1 1 0.100 0.0395 0.0417 0.1378 0.1454
2024-25 Malmö Redhawks U20 SuperElit 46 9 14 23 0.500 0.1973 0.1982 0.6888 0.6921
2025-26 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 24 1 10 11 0.458 0.2704 0.2596 1.3752 1.3205
2026-27 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 4 1 3 4 1.000 0.5899 0.5899 3.0007 3.0007
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

92%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18866
Forward overall
#807
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

Mike Szmatula
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eric Scheid
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gus Katsuras
Hamilton · 2001-02
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Ellis
SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.