IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Louis Jonerheim Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-07-07 Country: Sweden
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Signed Professionally
Malmö Redhawks · SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Malmö Redhawks U20 SHL-J20 12 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 Malmö Redhawks U20 SuperElit 10 0 1 1 0.100 0.0395 0.0417 0.1358 0.1433
2024-25 Malmö Redhawks U20 SuperElit 46 9 14 23 0.500 0.1973 0.1982 0.6791 0.6823
2025-26 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 24 1 10 11 0.458 0.2704 0.2596 1.3765 1.3218
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18552
Forward overall
#784
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

Brett Skibba
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Irwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Justin Joy
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2001-02
0.966 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Mania
UMass Dartmouth · 2018-19
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Karim Gayfullin
Curry · 2022-23
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.