← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brayden Thompson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-05-06 Country: Canada
Nebraska Omaha
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Minnetonka USHS-MN 31 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 Minnetonka USHS-MN 28 2 8 10 0.357 0.0452 0.0452 0.0867 0.0867
2025-26 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 54 2 8 10 0.185 0.1092 0.1149 0.5557 0.5845
2026-27 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 4 0 3 3 0.750 0.4424 0.4424 2.2505 2.2505
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

80%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20291
Defenseman overall
#1175
Defenseman born in 2008

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.95 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.64 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Nebraska Omaha Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

SHL 2025-26
0.06
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha
USHL 2012-13
0.64
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha
USHL 2019-20
0.19
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha
USHL 2021-22
0.50
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha

D2/3 Comparables

Wilkes · 2016-17
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2022-23
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2017-18
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.