← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brayden Thompson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-05-06 Country: Canada
Nebraska Omaha
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Minnetonka USHS-MN 31 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Minnetonka USHS-MN 28 2 8 10 0.357 0.0452 0.0452 0.0867 0.0867
2025-26 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 54 2 8 10 0.185 0.1092 0.1149 0.5562 0.5850
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

60%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20052
Defenseman overall
#1062
Defenseman born in 2008

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Boston College (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Nebraska Omaha Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.12
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha
NAHL 2012-13
0.08
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.06
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha

D2/3 Comparables

Hobart · 2015-16
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2017-18
0.579 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.