IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nolan Krenzen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-07-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 61 4 7 11 0.180 0.1064 0.1131 0.5410 0.5749
2019-20 — USHL 44 5 18 23 0.523 0.3083 0.3083 1.5685 1.5685
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC SR 36 0 11 11 0.306
2023-24 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC JR 40 2 8 10 0.250
2022-23 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC SO 34 1 8 9 0.265
2021-22 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC FR 30 1 5 6 0.200
2020-21 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC FR 21 0 4 4 0.191
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2020-21 · Nebraska Omaha
+78.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5219
Defenseman overall
#1202
Defenseman born in 2001
#2493
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Nash Worden
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Army (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Teemu Kivihalme
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Luke Shiplo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Phil Beaulieu
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Keaton Thompson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Graham Fallon
SUNY Cortland · 2003-04
0.917 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott McKenzie
Hamilton · 2017-18
0.579 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Maguyon
Hobart · 2015-16
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.