← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aaron Maguyon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-05-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 6 1 0 1 0.167 0.0385 0.0441 0.0816 0.0935
2015-16 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 41 14 23 37 0.902 0.2085 0.2297 0.4415 0.4864
2016-17 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 59 12 26 38 0.644 0.2366 0.2453 0.6798 0.7048
2017-18 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 58 24 26 50 0.862 0.3167 0.3127 0.9099 0.8983
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Hobart D3 SUNYAC 28 15 14 29 1.036
2019-20 Hobart D1 SUNYAC SO 28 7 9 16 0.571
2019-20 Hobart D3 SUNYAC 28 7 9 16 0.571
2018-19 Hobart D1 SUNYAC FR 25 10 6 16 0.640
2018-19 Hobart D3 SUNYAC 25 10 6 16 0.640
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2018-19 · Hobart
+161.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

60%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15061
Forward overall
#696
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.36 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Morrisville · 2005-06
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2015-16
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Williams · 2012-13
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.