IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Phil Beaulieu Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-09-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Fargo Force USHL 10 0 2 2 0.200 0.1274 0.1356 0.5993 0.6378
2013-14 — USHL 16 0 9 9 0.562 0.3582 0.3645 1.6856 1.7150
2014-15 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 60 10 19 29 0.483 0.3078 0.2980 1.4483 1.4024
2015-16 Madison Capitols USHL 60 1 13 14 0.233 0.1486 0.1370 0.6991 0.6445
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA SR 38 6 19 25 0.658
2018-19 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA JR 38 6 29 35 0.921
2017-18 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA SO 43 11 31 42 0.977
2016-17 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA FR 39 3 16 19 0.487
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.49
2016-17 · Northern Michigan
+156.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2500
Defenseman overall
#538
Defenseman born in 1995
#2252
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Casey Nelson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Zink
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Collin Kerchoff
Concordia Wisconsin · 2021-22
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Stallard
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Christopher Wallace
Bowdoin · 2014-15
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.