← New Search ↗ Social Card

Phil Beaulieu Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-09-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Fargo Force USHL 10 0 2 2 0.200 0.1180 0.1256 0.6007 0.6393
2013-14 USHL 16 0 9 9 0.562 0.3318 0.3376 1.6894 1.7189
2014-15 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 60 10 19 29 0.483 0.2851 0.2761 1.4515 1.4055
2015-16 Madison Capitols USHL 60 1 13 14 0.233 0.1376 0.1268 0.7007 0.6459
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA SR 38 6 19 25 0.658
2018-19 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA JR 38 6 29 35 0.921
2017-18 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA SO 43 11 31 42 0.977
2016-17 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA FR 38 3 13 16 0.421
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2016-17 · Northern Michigan
+139.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5003
Defenseman overall
#867
Defenseman born in 1995
#2240
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hobart · 2011-12
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia (WI) · 2021-22
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.