| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | Fargo Force | USHL | 10 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.200 | 0.1180 | 0.1256 | 0.6007 | 0.6393 |
| 2013-14 | — | USHL | 16 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 0.562 | 0.3318 | 0.3376 | 1.6894 | 1.7189 |
| 2014-15 | Waterloo Black Hawks | USHL | 60 | 10 | 19 | 29 | 0.483 | 0.2851 | 0.2761 | 1.4515 | 1.4055 |
| 2015-16 | Madison Capitols | USHL | 60 | 1 | 13 | 14 | 0.233 | 0.1376 | 0.1268 | 0.7007 | 0.6459 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Northern Michigan | D1 | WCHA | SR | 38 | 6 | 19 | 25 | 0.658 |
| 2018-19 | Northern Michigan | D1 | WCHA | JR | 38 | 6 | 29 | 35 | 0.921 |
| 2017-18 | Northern Michigan | D1 | WCHA | SO | 43 | 11 | 31 | 42 | 0.977 |
| 2016-17 | Northern Michigan | D1 | WCHA | FR | 38 | 3 | 13 | 16 | 0.421 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.