← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tommy Tsicos Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-06-20 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Univ. of Waterloo · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Collingwood Blues OJHL 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0350 0.0371 0.0984 0.1044
2010-11 OJHL 46 9 12 21 0.457 0.1119 0.1135 0.3143 0.3187
2011-12 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 24 11 9 20 0.833 0.2042 0.1980 0.5737 0.5564
2012-13 OJHL 34 6 15 21 0.618 0.1514 0.1393 0.4252 0.3912
2014-15 Univ. of Waterloo USports-M 9 0 1 1 0.111 0.0586 0.0600 0.3256 0.3332
2015-16 Univ. of Waterloo USports-M 28 3 10 13 0.464 0.2450 0.2386 1.3609 1.3255
2016-17 Univ. of Waterloo USports-M 24 0 6 6 0.250 0.1319 0.1220 0.7328 0.6778
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Curry D3 CNE 19 1 1 2 0.105
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2013-14 · Curry
-24.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30703
Forward overall
#1147
Forward born in 1992

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2017-18
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Framingham State · 2011-12
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2017-18
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.