← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brad Hauser Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-11-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Willmar WarHawks NA3HL 44 1 5 6 0.136 0.0171 0.0170 0.0431 0.0427
2012-13 Willmar WarHawks NA3HL 6 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC JR 11 0 3 3 0.273
2013-14 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#29517
Defenseman overall
#2448
Defenseman born in 1992
#5218
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hamline · 2022-23
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2012-13
0.120 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2018-19
0.083 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.