IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Drake Hunter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-11-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 20 3 4 7 0.350 0.0439 0.0436 0.1105 0.1097
2013-14 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 43 19 12 31 0.721 0.0905 0.0863 0.2276 0.2170
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Hamline D3 MIAC — 23 3 5 8 0.348
2016-17 Hamline D3 MIAC — 25 2 1 3 0.120
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2016-17 · Hamline
+102.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#40508
Forward overall
#1478
Forward born in 1993
#2085
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Albergo
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2012-13
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Rex Moe
Adrian · 2018-19
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Fisher
Wisconsin-Superior · 2006-07
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.