IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rex Moe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-11-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 50 9 20 29 0.580 0.1621 0.1681 0.4003 0.4150
2017-18 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 41 19 19 38 0.927 0.2589 0.2560 0.6396 0.6323
2018-19 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 25 9 10 19 0.760 0.2822 0.2729 0.8047 0.7782
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 31 17 17 34 1.097
2020-21 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 23 14 13 27 1.174
2019-20 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 23 13 6 19 0.826
2018-19 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 14 1 3 4 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2018-19 · Adrian
+51.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14849
Forward overall
#526
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andy Nelson
Bowdoin · 2002-03
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Vincent Dekumbis
Lawrence · 2017-18
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alec Hagaman
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2009-10
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.