← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rex Moe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-11-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 50 9 20 29 0.580 0.1422 0.1474 0.3993 0.4140
2017-18 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 41 19 19 38 0.927 0.2272 0.2246 0.6381 0.6308
2018-19 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 25 9 10 19 0.760 0.2792 0.2700 0.8022 0.7758
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 31 17 17 34 1.097
2020-21 Adrian D1 NCHA JR 23 14 13 27 1.174
2020-21 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 23 14 13 27 1.174
2019-20 Adrian D1 NCHA SO 23 13 6 19 0.826
2019-20 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 23 13 6 19 0.826
2018-19 Adrian D1 NCHA FR 14 1 3 4 0.286
2018-19 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 14 1 3 4 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2018-19 · Adrian
+72.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19511
Forward overall
#924
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bowdoin · 2002-03
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence · 2017-18
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2003-04
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.