IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Malkhassian Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-08-29 Country: Canada
Harvard
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 56 14 24 38 0.679 0.1663 0.1881 0.4672 0.5283
2024-25 Austin Bruins NAHL 54 8 22 30 0.556 0.2041 0.2265 0.5864 0.6508
2025-26 Lincoln Stars USHL 41 1 4 5 0.122 0.0720 0.0733 0.3664 0.3728
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36555
Forward overall
#1447
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Torrel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jason Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Harvard Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Michael Callow
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.47
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Philip Tresca
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.24
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Cameron Johnson
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.50
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Ben MacDonald
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.47
actual FR PPG at Harvard

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Delzer
Gustavus Adolphus · 2021-22
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Vince Marino
Salve Regina · 2016-17
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Elliott Clemmons
Endicott · 2016-17
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.