← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Thacker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-03-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 King Rebellion OJHL 8 1 0 1 0.125 0.0306 0.0336 0.0860 0.0944
2010-11 King Rebellion OJHL 45 0 10 10 0.222 0.0545 0.0573 0.1528 0.1607
2011-12 Vaughan Vipers OJHL 13 1 0 1 0.077 0.0188 0.0189 0.0529 0.0533
2012-13 Caledon Admirals OJHL 55 2 20 22 0.400 0.0980 0.0938 0.2751 0.2634
2013-14 OJHL 52 3 22 25 0.481 0.1178 0.1068 0.3306 0.2996
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SR 26 3 18 21 0.808
2016-17 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC JR 16 2 3 5 0.312
2015-16 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SO 26 1 7 8 0.308
2014-15 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC FR 23 2 5 7 0.304
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2014-15 · SUNY Potsdam
+217.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15673
Defenseman overall
#1663
Defenseman born in 1993
#3152
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2018-19
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2008-09
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.