IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam DiBrina Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-09-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Sudbury Cubs NOJHL 50 9 12 21 0.420 0.0715 0.0824 0.1780 0.2052
2010-11 Sudbury Cubs NOJHL 46 25 28 53 1.152 0.1962 0.2158 0.4883 0.5370
2011-12 Markham Waxers OJHL 48 14 14 28 0.583 0.1430 0.1478 0.4015 0.4150
2012-13 — OJHL 47 16 15 31 0.660 0.1617 0.1591 0.4540 0.4466
2013-14 Aurora Tigers OJHL 39 15 10 25 0.641 0.1571 0.1465 0.4412 0.4115
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Curry D3 CNE — 12 0 2 2 0.167
2014-15 Curry D3 CNE — 15 2 3 5 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2014-15 · Curry
+157.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30396
Forward overall
#1032
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chad Hennum
Hamline · 2011-12
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeff Eppright
University of New England · 2016-17
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Gavin Payne
St. Thomas · 2016-17
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.