IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jason Brochu Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-01-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Kanata Stallions CCHL 53 14 22 36 0.679 0.1473 0.1476 0.5255 0.5265
2014-15 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 61 34 32 66 1.082 0.2347 0.2243 0.8371 0.8000
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Hamilton D1 NESCAC SR 26 11 11 22 0.846
2018-19 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SR 26 11 11 22 0.846
2017-18 Hamilton D3 NESCAC JR 23 9 13 22 0.957
2016-17 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SO 29 12 8 20 0.690
2015-16 Hamilton D3 NESCAC FR 25 4 6 10 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2015-16 · Hamilton
+141.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16798
Forward overall
#641
Forward born in 1995
#234
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ethan James
Wisconsin-Superior · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Billy Foulds
Manhattanville · 2000-01
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alain Joanette
St. Norbert · 2006-07
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.