IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chad Malinowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-08-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Nepean Raiders CCHL 56 4 16 20 0.357 0.0775 0.0760 0.2735 0.2684
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Wesleyan D1 NESCAC SR 26 3 11 14 0.538
2018-19 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SR 26 3 11 14 0.538
2017-18 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC JR 26 3 12 15 0.577
2016-17 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SO 26 4 15 19 0.731
2015-16 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC FR 24 4 3 7 0.292
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2015-16 · Wesleyan
+306.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15253
Defenseman overall
#1907
Defenseman born in 1995
#1247
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aeron Kummu
Western New England · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Godfrey
Wilkes · 2017-18
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Spencer Quinn
Fredonia · 2021-22
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.