← New Search ↗ Social Card

Spencer Quinn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Rochester Monarchs USPHL-Premier 3 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Rochester Monarchs USPHL-Premier 6 1 2 3 0.500 0.0654 0.0654 0.1697 0.1697
2020-21 Protec Jr. Ducks EHL 29 11 16 27 0.931 0.2151 0.2151 0.4555 0.4555
2021-22 Protec Jr. Ducks EHL 42 22 34 56 1.333 0.3080 0.3158 0.6524 0.6689
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SO 9 1 2 3 0.333
2022-23 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 10 0 2 2 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2022-23 · Fredonia
-26.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
20%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8898
Forward overall
#429
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2023-24
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Finlandia · 2009-10
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern Maine · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.