IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Spencer Quinn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Rochester Monarchs USPHL-Premier 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2019-20 Rochester Monarchs USPHL-Premier 6 1 2 3 0.500 0.0564 0.0564 0.1701 0.1701
2020-21 Protec Jr. Ducks EHL 29 11 16 27 0.931 0.1362 0.1362 0.4565 0.4565
2021-22 Protec Jr. Ducks EHL 42 22 34 56 1.333 0.1951 0.2000 0.6537 0.6703
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SO 9 1 2 3 0.333
2022-23 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 10 0 2 2 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2022-23 · Fredonia
+16.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
20%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8292
Forward overall
#388
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Braydon Beahm
St. Norbert · 2023-24
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Scott
Finlandia · 2009-10
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Galloway
SUNY Brockport · 2018-19
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.