← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Hall Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-08-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Carolina Jr. Hurricanes USPHL-Elite 40 26 27 53 1.325 0.1223 0.1218 0.3034 0.3022
2015-16 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier-Classic 40 13 13 26 0.650 0.1825 0.1765 0.5344 0.5168
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Norwich D1 LittleEast SR 28 13 8 21 0.750
2019-20 Norwich D3 LittleEast 28 13 8 21 0.750
2018-19 Norwich D1 LittleEast JR 31 11 7 18 0.581
2018-19 Norwich D3 LittleEast 31 11 7 18 0.581
2017-18 Norwich D3 LittleEast 26 9 8 17 0.654
2016-17 Southern Maine D3 NEHC 14 4 3 7 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2016-17 · Southern Maine
+277.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27901
Forward overall
#1087
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Mary's (MN) · 2024-25
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2014-15
0.870 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Anna Maria · 2023-24
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.