IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Scott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-08-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 — NOJHL 28 10 14 24 0.857 0.1445 0.1439 0.3561 0.3545
2010-11 Fargo Force USHL 12 0 1 1 0.083 0.0530 0.0483 0.2496 0.2273
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Finlandia D3 — SR 18 3 1 4 0.222
2013-14 Finlandia D3 — JR 23 3 1 4 0.174
2012-13 Finlandia D3 — SO 25 8 4 12 0.480
2011-12 Finlandia D3 — FR 14 3 8 11 0.786
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.79
2011-12 · Finlandia
+960.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#36119
Forward overall
#1419
Forward born in 1990

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Dau
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Air Force (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jared Leslie
Hamilton · 2016-17
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
James McDonald
Nazareth · 2015-16
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Frankie Trazzera
Trine · 2018-19
0.481 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.