IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Scott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-08-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 — NOJHL 28 10 14 24 0.857 0.1431 0.1425 0.3568 0.3552
2010-11 Fargo Force USHL 12 0 1 1 0.083 0.0491 0.0447 0.2502 0.2279
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Finlandia D3 — SR 18 3 1 4 0.222
2013-14 Finlandia D3 — JR 23 3 1 4 0.174
2012-13 Finlandia D3 — SO 25 8 4 12 0.480
2011-12 Finlandia D3 — FR 14 3 8 11 0.786
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.79
2011-12 · Finlandia
+995.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#41594
Forward overall
#1496
Forward born in 1990

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor McNaughton
St. Olaf · 2024-25
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
James McDonald
Nazareth · 2015-16
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brad Schuler
Skidmore · 2009-10
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.