IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brad Schuler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1989-08-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Hamilton Red Wings OJHL 50 10 20 30 0.600 0.1471 0.1348 0.4131 0.3787
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SR 26 5 14 19 0.731
2012-13 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC JR 26 9 14 23 0.885
2011-12 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SO 27 3 9 12 0.444
2010-11 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC FR 26 3 7 10 0.385
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2010-11 · Skidmore
+202.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8195
Defenseman overall
#1053
Defenseman born in 1989
#1714
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alec Lovisek
Adrian · 2021-22
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Greco
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2008-09
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cody Mastay
Arcadia · 2021-22
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.