IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Godfrey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-07-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Premier 38 19 22 41 1.079 0.1217 0.1209 0.3670 0.3646
2018-19 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 54 2 5 7 0.130 0.0460 0.0438 0.1361 0.1296
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Wilkes D3 MAC SR 24 3 5 8 0.333
2021-22 Wilkes D3 MAC JR 19 2 8 10 0.526
2020-21 Wilkes D1 — SO 10 0 2 2 0.200
2020-21 Wilkes D3 MAC SO 10 0 2 2 0.200
2019-20 Wilkes D1 — FR 24 3 3 6 0.250
2019-20 Wilkes D3 MAC FR 24 3 3 6 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2019-20 · Wilkes
+291.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31881
Forward overall
#1594
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joel Frazee
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2018-19
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Samuel Beaulne
SUNY Geneseo · 2023-24
0.238 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mason Hoehn
SUNY Potsdam · 2021-22
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.