IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Samuel Beaulne Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-07-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Nepean Raiders CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Nepean Raiders CCHL 55 3 19 22 0.400 0.0868 0.0895 0.3096 0.3193
2022-23 — CCHL 46 3 15 18 0.391 0.0849 0.0838 0.3029 0.2988
2023-24 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 51 3 25 28 0.549 0.1269 0.1209 0.4439 0.4229
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SO 13 0 2 2 0.154
2024-25 SUNY Geneseo D3 — FR 21 0 5 5 0.238
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2024-25 · SUNY Geneseo
+137.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6188
Defenseman overall
#1524
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Burnett
SUNY Geneseo · 2017-18
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Johnny Panvica
St. Thomas · 2015-16
0.955 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Roman Uchyn
St. Norbert · 2014-15
0.690 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.