← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Burnett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-07-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 48 7 16 23 0.479 0.1761 0.1852 0.5058 0.5319
2016-17 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 56 23 22 45 0.804 0.2952 0.2944 0.8482 0.8459
2017-18 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 57 17 26 43 0.754 0.2772 0.2627 0.7963 0.7548
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC SR 27 4 6 10 0.370
2019-20 Geneseo D1 SO 13 1 7 8 0.615
2019-20 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC SO 13 1 7 8 0.615
2018-19 Geneseo D1 FR 27 5 10 15 0.556
2018-19 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC FR 27 5 10 15 0.556
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2018-19 · Geneseo
+135.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

60%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17531
Forward overall
#774
Forward born in 1997
#992
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connecticut College · 2024-25
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2016-17
0.862 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2022-23
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.