← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joel Frazee Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-07-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 CCHL 54 17 13 30 0.556 0.1586 0.1550 0.4301 0.4205
2018-19 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 25 3 4 7 0.280 0.1040 0.0990 0.2965 0.2823
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC 24 4 0 4 0.167
2021-22 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC 22 8 3 11 0.500
2020-21 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen JR 6 1 0 1 0.167
2019-20 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SO 29 7 1 8 0.276
2018-19 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 13 3 3 6 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2018-19 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+247.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32132
Forward overall
#1378
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2017-18
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia Wisconsin · 2011-12
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.