IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Singleton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-08-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 39 6 5 11 0.282 0.0788 0.0801 0.1947 0.1979
2007-08 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 48 12 16 28 0.583 0.1630 0.1583 0.4025 0.3909
2008-09 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 52 35 38 73 1.404 0.3922 0.3607 0.9688 0.8911
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 SUNY Oswego D3 — SR 30 4 13 17 0.567
2011-12 SUNY Oswego D3 — JR 24 5 5 10 0.417
2010-11 SUNY Oswego D3 — SO 16 3 7 10 0.625
2009-10 SUNY Oswego D3 — FR 20 1 3 4 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2009-10 · SUNY Oswego
-16.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14780
Forward overall
#647
Forward born in 1988
#904
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Adams
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ Holy Cross
0.44 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Storjohann
SUNY Cortland · 2016-17
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Romano
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andy Willock
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2005-06
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.