← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Singleton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-08-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 39 6 5 11 0.282 0.0691 0.0702 0.1942 0.1974
2007-08 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 48 12 16 28 0.583 0.1430 0.1389 0.4016 0.3900
2008-09 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 52 35 38 73 1.404 0.3441 0.3165 0.9665 0.8890
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SR 30 4 13 17 0.567
2011-12 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC JR 24 5 5 10 0.417
2010-11 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 16 3 7 10 0.625
2009-10 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 20 1 3 4 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2009-10 · SUNY Oswego
-4.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19593
Forward overall
#698
Forward born in 1988
#739
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connecticut College · 2011-12
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2024-25
1.560 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2005-06
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.