← New Search ↗ Social Card

Will Blake Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-07-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Breck School USHS-MN 25 9 18 27 1.080 0.2907 0.2815 0.2623 0.2540
2016-17 Winkler Flyers MJHL 59 13 25 38 0.644 0.1822 0.1802 0.4058 0.4014
2017-18 Winkler Flyers MJHL 60 16 28 44 0.733 0.2075 0.1952 0.4621 0.4347
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SR 24 0 3 3 0.125
2020-21 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen JR 10 2 2 4 0.400
2019-20 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SO 17 3 2 5 0.294
2018-19 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen FR 26 5 5 10 0.385
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2018-19 · Wisconsin-Superior
+137.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
40%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17961
Forward overall
#740
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lake Forest · 2017-18
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2022-23
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2003-04
1.235 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.