IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Byron Carlisle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-09-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 East Coast Wizards EHL 43 12 10 22 0.512 0.0749 0.0721 0.2506 0.2413
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Wentworth D1 CNE SR 25 1 2 3 0.120
2018-19 Wentworth D3 CNE SR 25 1 2 3 0.120
2017-18 Wentworth D3 CNE JR 13 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Wentworth D3 CNE SO 10 1 0 1 0.100
2015-16 Wentworth D3 CNE FR 25 2 5 7 0.280
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2015-16 · Wentworth
+353.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31482
Forward overall
#1207
Forward born in 1994
#1034
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gabriel Chuckran
UMass Boston · 2014-15
0.323 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Alec Thieda
Norwich · 2010-11
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Johnson
Nichols · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.