IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Michaud Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-04-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Portland Jr. Pirates USPHL-Premier-Classic 41 7 7 14 0.342 0.0959 0.0913 0.2813 0.2679
2015-16 New England Wolves |EHLP / Elite| EHLP 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SR 20 0 3 3 0.150
2017-18 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC JR 14 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SO 17 0 1 1 0.059
2015-16 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC FR 15 5 1 6 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2015-16 · Connecticut College
+411.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#47505
Forward overall
#1938
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nicholas Kovacs
SUNY Geneseo · 2023-24
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Knochenmus
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2012-13
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Jacobson
St. Thomas · 2010-11
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.